MMLU vs MMLU-Pro

MMLU or MMLU-Pro? MMLU-Pro is the harder, more reasoning-heavy successor. It has ten answer options instead of four, drops easy and noisy MMLU questions, and lowers scores by 16 to 33 points. Use MMLU-Pro when MMLU no longer separates the models you are comparing.

Last updated 2026-10-16 · Evals Review

MMLUMMLU-Pro
Made byHendrycks et al. (UC Berkeley & collaborators)TIGER-AI-Lab
Size57 subjects12,032 questions in 14 subject areas
Answer options4 (25% by chance)10 (10% by chance)
Question typeMostly knowledge recallMore multi-step reasoning; added STEM and exam problems
Chain of thoughtDirect answering often scores betterCoT can score about 20% higher than direct answering
Prompt sensitivity4–5% across 24 prompt stylesAbout 2%
StatusTop models score above 90%Wider spread between strong models
LicenseMITApache-2.0

Verdict: when to use which

Use MMLU if you need a broad, widely reported baseline or per-subject results for smaller models.

Use MMLU-Pro if you are comparing strong models whose MMLU scores sit within a few points of each other.

Dated numbers

FAQ

Why is MMLU-Pro harder than MMLU?

Ten options instead of four, fewer trivial or noisy questions, and more questions that need multi-step reasoning.

Are MMLU and MMLU-Pro scores comparable?

No. They are different question sets with different chance levels (25% vs 10%).

Sources

Every row restates facts from these sources, also cited on each eval's page. A dash means not verified.

Other comparisons: SWE-bench vs SWE-bench-Live · HumanEval vs BigCodeBench · HumanEval vs LiveCodeBench · MMLU vs GPQA · AlpacaEval vs MT-Bench (LLM-as-a-judge paper) · MT-Bench (LLM-as-a-judge paper) vs LMArena (Chatbot Arena) · BEIR vs MTEB Leaderboard · WebArena vs OSWorld · HarmBench vs StrongREJECT · GAIA vs BrowseComp · SWE-Bench Pro vs SWE-bench Verified · Terminal-Bench vs SWE-bench · GPQA vs Humanity's Last Exam · Ragas vs DeepEval