Image and vision benchmarks, compared

Vision benchmarks test whether a model can read and reason over images: expert diagrams, math figures, charts and general perception.

4 entries · facts only from each linked source; blank fields were not verified.

EvalMade byWhat it testsLicenseLast updatedSource
MMMUMMMU team (OSU, Waterloo & collaborators)Expert-level multimodal understanding and reasoning.Apache-2.0Repo last commit 2026-07-28mmmu-benchmark.github.io
MathVistaUCLA, University of Washington & Microsoft ResearchMathematical reasoning over figures, plots and images.CC-BY-SA-4.0Repo last commit 2026-07-27mathvista.github.io
MMBenchOpenCompass (Shanghai AI Lab & collaborators)Broad perception and reasoning skills of vision-language models.Apache-2.0Repo last commit 2025-05-22github.com
ChartQAMasry et al. (academic)Question answering over charts.GPL-3.0Repo last commit 2025-04-18github.com

In short

MMMU — About 11.5K college-level questions across six disciplines and 30 subjects, each pairing text with images such as charts, diagrams, maps and chemical structures.

MathVista — 6,141 math problems set in visual contexts, drawn from 28 existing multimodal datasets plus three new ones (IQTest, FunctionQA, PaperQA).

MMBench — A bilingual (English and Chinese) multiple-choice benchmark that breaks vision-language ability into fine-grained skills, with a scoring method meant to be more robust than single-pass answers.

ChartQA — 9.6K human-written and 23.1K generated questions about real charts that need visual reading plus logical and arithmetic reasoning.

Browse the full Image & vision evals category, or see other comparisons.