Safety & factuality

Task-Tampering Prompt Injection benchmark

by Amazon Science (Rongting Zhang, Martin Bertran, Sandeep Avula, Chia-Jung Lee, Vanessa Murdock)

What is Task-Tampering Prompt Injection benchmark? Task-Tampering Prompt Injection benchmark is a safety & factuality eval made by Amazon Science (Rongting Zhang, Martin Bertran, Sandeep Avula, Chia-Jung Lee, Vanessa Murdock). An indirect prompt-injection benchmark where the planted content does not hijack the agent into a different task, but bends a decision inside the task it is already doing (for example, a fake refund policy cited in a buyer's dispute). It has 90 validated cases across three tool-use environments with 1,433 injection variants, each aimed at a different part of the agent's decision making, such as its rules, available actions or beliefs about state. The paper finds that defenses tuned to objective-hijacking attacks leave these attacks noticeably more successful. Runs go through inspect_ai; the release is for research reproducibility and is non-commercial.

Page last updated 2026-10-18 · Evals Review

Editor note

An indirect prompt-injection benchmark where the planted content does not hijack the agent into a different task, but bends a decision inside the task it is already doing (for example, a fake refund policy cited in a buyer's dispute). It has 90 validated cases across three tool-use environments with 1,433 injection variants, each aimed at a different part of the agent's decision making, such as its rules, available actions or beliefs about state. The paper finds that defenses tuned to objective-hijacking attacks leave these attacks noticeably more successful. Runs go through inspect_ai; the release is for research reproducibility and is non-commercial.

What it tests
Whether tool-using agents can be manipulated into a wrong outcome by untrusted content without changing the task, and how well defenses catch it.
Original source
github.com/amazon-science/task-tampering-prompt-injection
Last updated
Repo last push 2026-11-06; arXiv v1 2026-11-05
License
CC BY-NC 4.0

Facts come only from the linked source (checked 15–16 Oct 2026). Credit belongs to the creators. We don't score or rank evals: how we review.

Reviews

No reviews yet.

Reviews are written by people who sign in with GitHub, one per account per eval. We can't confirm that each reviewer used the eval; we remove reviews that break our rules, never just for being negative, and we never add, buy or edit reviews. Averages, when shown, come only from these reviews.

Sign in with GitHub to review

Related safety & factuality evals

  • HarmBench — Robustness to jailbreaks and harmful requests.
  • TruthfulQA — Truthfulness versus imitating human misconceptions.
  • StrongREJECT — Real effectiveness of jailbreak attacks.
  • SimpleQA — Short-form factuality and calibration.

All Safety & factuality evals

Discussion

No one has discussed Task-Tampering Prompt Injection benchmark yet. Have you run it? Share what it caught, what it missed or how you set it up.

Sign in with GitHub to comment

Be specific and kind. No promotion or affiliate links. Community rules · All discussions